Search for: "Bridge Company v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am by Jim Baker
If the United States, for example, mandated back doors and golden keys for law enforcement, it would harm the ability of American technology companies and telecommunications providers to compete globally and it could stifle innovation at home. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful –  Suneet Sharma. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  (Source: here ) No contingency fee system:  Contingency fee arrangement has been one of the distinguishing features of litigation in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  While performing its obligations under the company’s contract with Austin Bridge, Hayward incurred higher-than-expected cement costs, which the River Authority refused to reimburse the company for. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am by Matthew Rizzolo
United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893), for example, the Court held that the government had to pay just compensation when it took away a company’s public franchise to take tolls on a bridge. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” NECA “is a leading provider of collectible figures, games and game equipment in the United States and abroad. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
" You learn something new every day.Robert Brauneis and Anke Moerland's recent article argues that it would not be good policy to allow the company that distributes siggi's ® yogurt to trademark the name SKYR for yogurt in the United States, even though most people in the United States do not currently know what the word "skyr" means. [read post]