Search for: "Bridges v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Superior Court (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 837, and my 8/5/20 and 8/26/20 posts on it can be found here and here. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:29 am
By Daniel RichardsonO’Connor v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:23 am
Maldonado v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Overall, whilst the search for superior alternatives was desirable, that fact alone did not put the UK in breach of EU law. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
LUSTIG v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
The majority opinion drew a sharp dissent, and it will either be appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, or go back to the Maricopa County, Arizona Superior Court for further proceedings (or, of course, it may be settled).Is this type of case just an "informed consent" case: i.e., if the "informed consent" had been broader, there would be no viable claims? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
(James Bailey, Knights Bridge Vineyards, LLC, Real Parties in Interest) (2019) _____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
Supp. 2d 367, 374 (D.N.J. 2010). 41037-1-II / 41047-8-II FACTS The State charged Roden in two separate cause numbers with attempted possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 09-1-01153-0) and with possession of heroin (superior court cause no. 10-1-00091-4). [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 7:44 am
In this case, plaintiff had the right to compel arbitration of its dispute with defendant, and thereafter, to have its award confirmed in Superior Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
On 19 January 2015, Mew J in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the libel case of Bernstein v Poon 2015 ONSC 155. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:06 pm
Finally, in Roper, the Court caved in to this pressure. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics (Pharma Patents) US: CAFC Affirms district court de novo review in section 146 action: Streck v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
In Sutliff v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 1:02 pm
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
The court finally stepped in again in the 2010 case of Skilling v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:40 am
These expenses may include costs such as maintaining a professional designation, attending conferences/workshops, parking fees, printing expenses, and networking coffees/lunches.Court Awards Relocation Costs Incurred in MitigationWhile these costs may, in some cases, seem nominal, a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sends an important reminder to all workers to diligently track and seek compensation for all expenses incurred in mitigating a loss of… [read post]
