Search for: "Briggs v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
In this respect, Lord Briggs commended the summary by Sales LJ in AAA v Unilever plc [2018] EWCA Civ 1532, para 36 (another challenge to jurisdiction on similar issues) that “A parent company will only be found to be subject to a duty of care in relation to an activity of its subsidiary if ordinary, general principles of the law of tort regarding the imposition of a duty of care on the part of the parent in favour of a claim are satisfied in the particular case”. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The appeal was considered by Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court composed of President Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs unanimously dismissed the appeal. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
Earlier this year, two editors of the UKSC Blog, Jack Ballantyne and Louise Pearce, were invited to interview Lord Briggs at the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Lord Briggs and Lord HodgeLord Briggs and Lord Hodge prefer the view of Arnold J , whereby the test is whether the alleged infringer subjectively intended to target the patent-protected market. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:26 pm
The promissory justification does not adequately account for the authorisation of party autonomy by the choice of law rules of the forum, the supervening application of the laws of the forum and other states and ultimate forum control. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
