Search for: "Briscoe v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
City of New York, No. 08-969 Opinion in Briscoe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:19 am by Lyle Denniston
After hearing argument January 11 in a sequel case, Briscoe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am by Michael Lowe
  One good bit of news in all that mess is the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:22 am by Russ Bensing
  On Monday, the Supreme Court had oral argument in Briscoe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:18 am by David Oscar Markus
As has become her custom, Sotomayor actively questioned both sides during Monday's argument in Briscoe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 6:44 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Description of the issue is from ScotusWiki, which also has links to briefs and opinions below: Monday, Jan. 11 Briscoe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:07 am by Russ Bensing
The assignment of error in the 12th District's case of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Erin Miller
Matt also wrote about an article explaining the significance of a case to be argued in January, Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm by Matt Sundquist
The New York Times describes the possibility that the Court's decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Adam Liptak has an article in the New York Times on the January 11th oral argument scheduled in Briscoe v. [read post]