Search for: "Brown v. Collections, Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s NLRB v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Specifically, the final rules provide employers with the flexibility to distinguish between hourly and salaried employees in addition to the previously identified classes of full-time, part-time, collectively bargained employees, seasonal employees, employees who work in a specific insurance rating area, foreign employees working abroad, and employees subject to a 90-day waiting period for traditional group health plan coverage. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
In Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Corey Robin in connection with Robin’s new book, “The Enigma of Clarence Thomas” (Metropolitan Books, 2019). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Here’s what to look forward to in 2020: New Employee Classification Test: AB 5 codifies the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
Brown, 18-1203, the news service seeks to revisit that decision, arguing that the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
” Brown v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
And then there is Professor Raoul Burger’s version in his book, “Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment,” in which Burger argued that Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
& Care Home, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
” “Jurisdiction is not acquired pursuant to CPLR 308(2) unless both the delivery and mailing requirements have been strictly complied with'” (Josephs v AACT Fast Collections Services., Inc., 155 AD3d 1010, 1012, quoting Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu, 90 AD3d 988, 989; accord Munoz v Reyes, 40 AD3d 1059, 1059; Ludmer v Hasan, 33 AD3d 594, 594). [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
These are collected through fine surcharges under subs. 60.1 (4) the Provincial Offences Act and subs. 727.9 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
"Browning-Ferris Industries of Oho, Inc. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
Posted by , on Friday, June 21, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of June 14–21, 2019. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Citibank in one of the most-often cited opinions involving collection of credit card debt: Winchek v. [read post]
