Search for: "Brown v. Federal Insurance Company" Results 121 - 140 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2011, 10:00 am by Nathan Koppel
The suit involves a claim by a homeowner that a title insurer improperly paid millions of dollars to title companies in exchange for those companies referring business to the insurer. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
Manton was a personal injury case in which the plaintiff had incurred over $21,000 in medical expenses, and her providers had agreed to accept some $7,000 from her insurance company in full payment. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:04 pm by Paul R. Monsees
And, as we have reported, a federal court in the District of Columbia is also considering a joint employer test in Browning Ferris v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was immediately appointed as receiver. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
For publication opinions today (3): In Lora Wilson Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Montgomery McCracken
(SAIC), an information-technology company that handles data for the federal government. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  If a religious nonprofit organization opts out, the insurance company that issues the policy to the employer, or the third-party administrator that administers its self-insured group health plan, generally must assume responsibility for contraceptive coverage and provide or arrange separate payments to employees for contraceptive services. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:32 am
  University of Denver law professor Jay Brown has extensively covered the Collins & Aikman criminal prosecution on the Race to the Bottom blog (here), including in particular his discussion (here) of how the criminal prosecution exhausted the company’s D&O insurance. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Company v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29,2008)(Jefferson) (insurance coverage, duty to defend)ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 10:49 am by Steve Bainbridge
Scott Rasmussen asked last month whose decisions people feared more in health care: that of the federal government or of insurance companies. [read post]