Search for: "Brown v. United States Court of Appeals et al" Results 121 - 140 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Kali Borkoski
Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of Humane Society of America et al.Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al.Petitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians et al.Petitioner's reply CVSG Information:Invited: January 18, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition CVSG Information:Invited: February 28, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
  (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
JacksonDocket: 10-735Issue(s): Whether the Due Process Clause prevents state courts from employing the class-action device to eliminate fundamental substantive and procedural protections that would otherwise apply to adjudications of class members' individual claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of… [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
§  Petition for certiorari §  Brief in opposition §  Amicus brief of Alabama Appellate Court Justices et al. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am by stevemehta
Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Pearson, L.L.P., et al., Super. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]