Search for: "Burgess v. Burgess"
Results 121 - 140
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2016, 6:28 pm
The secret is found in Burgess v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 7:48 am
Burgess v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 11:08 am
This was not the case in the recent decision of Burgess v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:57 pm
In today’s case (Norris v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Before clicking, try guessing the authors' choice for each decade.Paul Burgess, a PhD candidate at the University of Edinburgh, has published Should Entick v Carrington be on our Rule of Law Radar? [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:59 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:33 pm
In today’s case (Anderson v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
More coverage of Monday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Richard Burgess, Am. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
A search of reported family judgments for the term polygraph brought up only one hit : F v Y (ABDUCTION: ACQUIESCENCE) [2014] 2 FLR 875 (HHJ Horowitz QC sitting as a HCJ), a case in which there is a single reference to a polygraph test taken by a Russian father, apparently in another jurisdiction, but it does not appear the test was adduced in evidence. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:51 am
Gillie and the prisoner exhaustion case Ross v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:56 pm
I don't have much time now, but I wanted to do a quick post about the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in Burgess v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm
This is particularly so in light of a recent judgment from the Court of Appeal on the potential for a claim in negligence against a professional offering advice, see Burgess & Anor v Lejonvarn [2016] EWHC 40 (TCC) (15 January 2016) where Alexander Nissen QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) held : In conclusion, it is established that in law a duty of care extends to the protection against economic loss in respect of both advice and any service in… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:09 am
V. [read post]
