Search for: "Burrell v. Burrell"
Results 121 - 140
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 3:43 am
Burrell, No. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Consider Milstein v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 7:12 am
This case is styled, Home State County Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Coach v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Mayne v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
The judgment of Judge Sharon Burrell can be found here. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
On the same day Haddon-Cave J heard an application in the case of Power Place Tours v Free Spirit. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Burrell: thinking through what we mean by unrepresentative: are there reasons to think that the ways in which groups differ matter to the perception/confusion question? [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Keeble v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
Could have made a categorical exclusion, but it didn’t do that.Viewpoint v. content based. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Mid-Point Discussants: Robert Burrell: Using the patent monopoly period to develop secondary meaning. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:23 am
, Bethel v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Robert Burrell: Difficulties we have with nonuse. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
With respect to Beebe’s point about how well the system works for an unfamiliar judge: University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
