Search for: "C&C Directories Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
Box 1437/Slot 1412 Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 682-2441; (800) 852-5494 (Toll Free) Fax: (501) 371-2785 Web: http://www.state.ar.us/dhs/aging/index.html ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000 Houston, TX 77019 Phone: (713) 520-0232 (V/TTY); (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: dlrp@ilru.org Web: http://www.dlrp.org State Affiliate: Arkansas ADA Roundtable c/o Mainstream 1818 South… [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Until 31 December 2017, an agent compliantly registered in either the old directory or the new directory will satisfy the online service provider’s obligation under section 512(c)(2) of the DCMA. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:10 am by Rob Robinson
Mike Haven, Sr Directory, AGC and Head of Legal Operations, Gap, Inc. and CLOC Board Member urges caution in adopting new technology, “Workflow automation, robotic process automation and machine learning all are promising technologies that can and will be leveraged in the legal industry of the future. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(IP tango) Canada CMEC on ‘making multiple copies for class use’ (Excess Copyright) Clearing up the copyright confusion: Fair dealing and Bill C-32 (Michael Geist) C-32 Legislative Committee discussion marked by copyright confusion (Michael Geist) (IP Osgoode) Jim Henshaw asks questions about copying levies (Michael Geist) More schools backing away from Access Copyright (Michael Geist) China China – from national growth to international expansion (IP Think Tank)… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Real world difficulty in combining prior art teachings does not [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
shutterstock/bethge radiation warning sign Doe sued Internet Brands, Inc., the owner of Model Mayhem, alleging that two unrelated individuals drugged and assaulted her (and recorded her for a pornographic video). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm by Eric Goldman
Accepting plaintiffs’ argument would eviscerate Section 230(c)(1); a defendant interactive computer service would be ineligible for Section 230(c)(1) immunity by virtue of simply organizing and displaying content exclusively provided by third parties. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Check our directory of services or email us to find qualified claim reviewers to grade your files. [read post]