Search for: "C E C F Trust" Results 121 - 140 of 1,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
Jones v Canal & River Trust (2017) EWCA Civ 135 This was an appeal against an order that Canal and River Trust could remove Mr Jones boat from a canal near Bradford on Avon, under its powers under s.8 of the British Waterways Act 1983 and s.13 of the British Waterways Act 1971. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  Specifically, according to Paragraph 3 of the 2009 Practice Direction concerning the Estates List, the following matters are heard:  (a) All matters arising under Rules 74 and 75 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; (b) Applications under Rule 14.05 regarding estates, wills and trusts, including applications for advice under section 60 of the Trustee Act; (c) Applications relating to inter vivos trusts, whether under Rule 14.05, the Variation of… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
(c) A trust authorized by this section may be enforced by a person appointed in the terms of the trust or, if no person is so appointed, by a person appointed by the court. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:25 am by Christine Swanick
  Examples of such evidence include, but are not limited to: (a) treaty-making with tribes, (b) contract approval for tribes or Indians, (c) enforcement of federal legislation applicable to tribes, such as enforcement of the Trade and Intercourse Acts, (d) education of Indian students, (e) provision of health or social services to a tribe, (f) administration of services by the Office of Indian Affairs with respect to a tribe and (g) adoption or rejection by the tribe… [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Simon, J held that as Melanie was not detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, the NHS trust had no operational obligation under art 2 towards her and that: (a)   In any event, there would have been no breach of this obligation; (b)  There was no systemic breach of art 2; (c)   There was no breach of any investigatory obligation under art 2; (d)  Melanie’s parents could not be considered “victims” for the purposes of HRA 1998, s 7;… [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:06 am
Adjani, 452 F.3d at 1150 ("The government should not be required to trust the suspect's self-labeling when executing a warrant. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
  But if the 2011 SEC CF Guidance was a wake-up call for public companies, the 2018 SEC Guidance is a resounding fire alarm — and is a must-read for any C-suite executive at a public company. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:13 am by Elliot Setzer
(NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 3:01 am
United States Patent No. 5,482,289Method of Playing a BINGO Game with Progressive Jackpot Issued on January 9, 1996 to Gary Weingardt and assigned to Gary Weingardt Trust. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
§2040(b), which provides an exception to married couples, does not apply. f. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:03 pm
New York City Probate Lawyers said the motion for summary judgment presently before the court seeks an order: (a) granting summary judgment removing the son as executor of the estates of the parents; (b) granting summary judgment removing the co-trustees of the Trust and the Trust due to misconduct including self-dealing, conflict of interest and waste of estate and trust assets, and directing respondents to account as executors and co-trustees; (c) compelling… [read post]