Search for: "C. Heath" Results 121 - 140 of 279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2021, 10:50 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
/VOL. 6435957 CALACATTA SIERRA 6431796 THE FINNISH LONG DRINK LEGEND OF 1952 6431765 AMYVID 6436158 PECKER SPRAY 6431606 S3LF MAD3 LEGEND 6435821 UDDERLY AWESOME GIFTS AND GAMES 6431525 C 6431524 C CHARIS FELLOWSHIP TRUTH. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
C must in fact have relied upon the common assumption rather than merely upon C’s own independent view of the matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Sharafi & Anor v Woven Rugs Ltd &… [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 12:18 pm by Cappetta Law Offices
  Under M.G.L. c. 201D § 5:  An agent shall have the authority to make any and all health care decisions on the principal’s behalf that the principal could make, including decisions about life-sustaining treatment, subject, however, to any express limitations in the health care proxy. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 4:57 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
It was ruled that the legal and factual situations were not identical, as required by Article 8.1 of Regulation 1215/2012, known as “Brussels I bis”, and as interpreted by the Solvay judgment of the CJEU (C-616/10, because the patents and the products in question were not identical in the three countries, so that the judgments relating to the said applications were likely to be divergent, but not irreconcilable. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:39 am
Stacey Greenwell is a 2009 Fellow and Abby Heath-Thorne was recognized as a Rising Star within the organization. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 11:26 pm by Anders Valentin
In that connection, Sandoz argued that it must follow from C-57/15 (United Video Properties) that the award of costs to cover legal assistance must reflect the general rates applicable for external legal counsel in IP matters, and that the assessment must take as its starting point the actual costs incurred in that respect. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
 USA Today’s Brad Heath twitted a great quote** from United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:10 pm by gavin.n.johnson
Basic Principle A major purpose of the Privacy Rule is to define and limit the circumstances in which an individual’s protected heath information (PHI) may be used or disclosed by covered entities. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:23 am
Heath Hyde, who prosecuted the case, said he offered a deal because the victim had a long history of violence against women. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 12:37 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
C/09/505587 / HA ZA 16-206 (ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:1025). [3] Regional Court Mannheim, judgments of July 1, 2016 (7 O 209/15) and November 17, 2016 (7 O 19/16), Philips v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:34 am by Brad Spitz
The ECJ refers to the case law it developed in trade mark law (case C-324/09 L’Oréal and Others, para. 64, but also joined cases C-585/08 and C-144/09 Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof, para. 69) to rule that the localisation of an act of re-utilisation depends on there being evidence that the act of re-utilisation discloses an intention to target persons in that territory. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:34 am by Kluwer Blogger
The ECJ refers to the case law it developed in trade mark law (case C-324/09 L’Oréal and Others, para. 64, but also joined cases C-585/08 and C-144/09 Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof, para. 69) to rule that the localisation of an act of re-utilisation depends on there being evidence that the act of re-utilisation discloses an intention to target persons in that territory. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
 by Agnieszka Sztoldman “On 17 September the CJEU handed down a long-awaited judgment on a matter that thrilled sports fans and the IP community (C-449/18P, C-474/18P, available in French and Spanish). [read post]