Search for: "CIR Law Offices" Results 121 - 140 of 7,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2023, 9:57 am by Kirk M. Hartung
In August 2019, the Patent Office sought feedback on whether the current laws need to be revised to consider inventive contributions by non-natural persons. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:40 am
City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231 (4th Cir. 1999)(denying qualified immunity in law enforcement personnel cases)"). [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:16 am
Oklahoma).Appeal of convictions and sentence for: (1) using and carrying firearm during drug-trafficking crime resulting in death of state law enforcement officer; and (2) using and carrying firearm in killing of state law enforcement officer during performance of his duties in violation of 21 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:00 am by Uthman Law Office
Anderson (9th Cir., May 2, 2024, No. 20-50345) 2024 WL 1920298 Warrantless searches by law enforcement for inventory purposes Summary: Law enforcement may conduct warrantless inventory searches of impounded vehicles only if they are motivated by administrative purposes, and not solely by investigatory purposes. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
City of Royal Oak, 469 F.3d 559 (6th Cir. 2006): We conclude that whether the officers were entitled to qualified immunity depends on whether they acted in a law-enforcement capacity or in an emergency-medical-response capacity when engaging in the conduct that McKenna claimed violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Lehi, 446 Fed.Appx. 96 (10th Cir. 2011) (affirming criminal conviction for assault on BIA officer) Nanomantube v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:21 am
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 556 U.S. 163 (2009), and Lingle v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]