Search for: "CLOSE v. COATES"
Results 121 - 140
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Harney v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
” People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 9:18 am
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:09 am
Columbia Sportswear v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
" on Coatings World. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 6:40 pm
V. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
I prefer the risks of liberty to the white coats of well-meaning public health officers. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:25 am
This very question was addressed a few days ago in the judgment that the General Court (GC) rendered in Zdút v EUIPO, T-250/21 (NEHRA). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
“I spit on those (beautiful) CONFLICT diamonds and (so … soft) EVIL fur coat! [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
An ordinary case involving kid's coats -- but with a cinematic twist. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:58 am
Trump and the subject of close scrutiny by the FBI and the Special Counsel’s team. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:04 pm
” The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:58 am
Trump and the subject of close scrutiny by the FBI and the Special Counsel’s team. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
There does not seem to be any reason why the unit cannot be in close proximity to the police station, or even in a separate part of the station. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:29 am
" Coates v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
” TUCO, 960 S.W.2d at 636 (emphasis original) (citing Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
