Search for: "COLLIER V. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 12:14 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITSocial Services LawPanel Upholds Benefits Denial to Lou Gehrig's Disease Sufferer Lacking Required '20/40 Rule' Work History Collier v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:48 am
(These cases, including Ramirez v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:07 pm
Collier. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
App. 447 (2009). [10] Collier, 2 Vet. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
App. 447 (2009). [10] Collier, 2 Vet. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:04 pm
Collier was the first time that they heard argument on the right of inmates to receive religious comfort and guidance in their final moments. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:38 pm
Collier. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, yesterday the Court decided in Ramirez v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:39 am
United States, No. 1:10-cv8435 (S.D.N.Y.); see also Pedersen v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:02 pm
Passlogix, Inc. v. 2FA Tech., LLC, 2010 WL 1702216 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:28 pm
First, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Furman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
Following the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Andros v Colliers Macaulay Nicolls Inc., 2019 ONCA 679, Justice Dow found that Mr. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:29 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia’s in State of Texas v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:50 pm
An action for damages resulting from a dog bite may only be compensated under a theory of strict liability and not for common law negligence as demonstrated in Petrone v Fernandez, 12 NY3d 546, 550; Bard v Jahnke, 6 NY3d 592, 599; Collier v Zambito, 1 NY3d 444, 446-448. [read post]
