Search for: "COUNCIL v. DANIELS" Results 121 - 140 of 554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
George Wright, Free Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 11:08 am by Giles Peaker
The two notes of judgment below are by Daniel Grütters, of One Pump Court, counsel for Mr Perrott and we are very grateful for them. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
A National Security Council spokeswoman did not reply to a request for comment. . . . [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:40 am
I can see that "auspicabile" is an Italian word, and the quote is from the author of the study, Emanuele Castano of the University of Trento and the National Research Council in Italy. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The minister published correspondence between the journalist and officials in launching the attack, which led to an alert about the risk to media freedom being registered with the Council of Europe. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Saris, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts,  member of President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST); Leonard P. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 19 February 2021 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Sellers v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth And Development Affairs & Anor [2021] EWHC 358 (QB)   He dismissed claims by Paul Sellers, the former Country Director of the British Council in Italy, that two emails (of three complained of) sent by staff at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the British Council were defamatory of him at common law. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by admin
In his essay in the Public Affairs Quarterly, Cranor attempts to explain and support his advocacy of WOE in the notorious case, Milward, in which Cranor, along with his friend and business partner, Martyn Smith, served as partisan, paid expert witnesss.[2] Not disclosed in this article is that after the trial court excluded the opinions of Cranor and Smith under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and plaintiff appealed, the lawsuit industry, acting through The Council for Education and Research… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 7:27 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The re-trial of Martin and another v Kogan [2021] EWHC 24 (Ch) confirmed this to be the case. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (Jin-Taek Hong & Daniel McCarthy, Cornell Legal Information Institute) Preview of FCC v. [read post]
The City Council approved the project based upon a negative declaration following an appeal from the planning commission approval. [read post]
The City Council approved the project based upon a negative declaration following an appeal from the planning commission approval. [read post]
The Court, thus, concluded that the adoption and amendment of statewide rules governing inverse condemnation statutes should be left to the Legislature or Judicial Council. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]