Search for: "COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT" Results 121 - 140 of 1,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2008, 9:57 pm
  More after the jump.So the deal is this:  The Third District Court of Appeal, like many courts, has a mediation program. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Later in the opinion, the Court similarly observed that where plaintiffs’ appellate briefs did not state each point raised under a separate heading, as required by Rule 8.204(a)(1)(B) of the California Rules of Court, their arguments were “forfeited.” [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
” The joint petition arises from two cases in which California district courts refused to compel arbitration involving the Coinbase User Agreement. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
Bruggman, Assistant Clerk/Executive Officer, 914 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814, or by e-mail to Colette.bruggman@jud.ca.gov.The Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District has announced its intention to destroy records under Rule 10.1028(d) of the California Rules of Court. [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:33 am
Koh and Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the Northern District of California, state Judge Holly A. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed October 19, and later ordered published on November 15, 2018, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment upholding Plumas County’s First comprehensive update of its 1984 general plan, and rejecting arguments that the update violated the California Timberland Productivity Act of 1982 (the “Timberland Act” or “Act”) and that the related EIR violated CEQA. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:45 pm
LEXIS 1896, the Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District wrestled with the treatment of subspecies and species range in the California Endangered Species Act (“CESA”). [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:45 pm
LEXIS 1896, the Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District wrestled with the treatment of subspecies and species range in the California Endangered Species Act (“CESA”). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:08 am
She stayed on the court for 27 years, serving as presiding judge of the 2nd District Court of Appeal's Division 1 for 20 years. [read post]
5 May 2018, 5:31 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
On November 29, 2017, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, addressed when the corporate veil can be pierced for wage-and-hour violations. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 12:07 pm
: Peter Krause, as Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District (Sacramento)Noon to 12:30 p.m. [read post]
  Judge Conrad Rushing of California's sixth appellate district has some guidance for you. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The Third District Court of Appeal recently wrestled with CEQA’s equivalent to defining the undefinable, concluding that the level of detail on a programmatic EIR was sufficient.The most recent treatment of the topic involves the various challenges to the decision of the California High-Speed Rail Authority in certifying a program EIR for a preferred route corridor from the Bay Area into the Central Valley. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed November 26, and ordered published on December 23, 2019, the Third District Court of Appeal partially reversed a judgment rejecting a labor union’s CEQA challenges to the EIS/EIR for a geothermal power plant project on federal land in Mono County. [read post]