Search for: "CUSTODY OF C S F"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
”Appellant, 394 F.3d at 343. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:43 am
(5) The court may also consider the following criteria as appropriate and relevant in making a determination of the type of bond and conditions of release: (a) The employment status and history of the person in custody; (b) The nature and extent of family relationships of the person in custody; (c) Past and present residences of the person in custody; (d) The character and reputation of the person in custody; (e) Identity of persons who agree to assist… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:14 am
Civil commitment order justified officers' entry to take custody of plaintiff under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:59 am
Kramer, 445 F.3d 346 (4th Cir. 2006) (holding joint rights of custody are considered “rights of custody” under Article 5(a) of the Hague Convention). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
§1912(f )—which bars involuntary termi- nation of a parent’s rights in the absence of a heightened showing that serious harm to the Indian child is likely to result from the parent’s “continued custody” of the child— does not apply when, as here, the relevant parent never had custody of the child. [read post]
E.D.Mich.: Under Patane, a Miranda violation does not preclude using product to get a search warrant
7 Nov 2009, 10:48 am
His statement was custodial and he was not Mirandized, but, under Patane, it could be used to get a search warrant. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:06 am
[N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-13(f).] [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:57 pm
Mother’s gross monthly income: c. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
Superior Court, seeking “primary physical custody” and “joint legal custody” of the child. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
See R-S-C v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:38 pm
This evidence was sufficient to support the Family Court's finding that the mother neglected the child pursuant to Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B], § 1046[a][iii], Matter of Ajay Sumert D., Matter of Ndeye D., Matter of Kiara C. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:10 am
BlockFi’s Settlement. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:52 am
Gelman & Associates’ own David Frenkel recently wrote about Bill C-78 for The Lawyer’s Daily. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:52 am
Gelman & Associates’ own David Frenkel recently wrote about Bill C-78 for The Lawyer’s Daily. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
In settlements where the future medical is going to be closed as part of the settlement the following must be considered: CLASS I BENEFICIARY Claimant is considered a Class I Medicare beneficiary if: a) Claimant is 65 years or older; b) Claimant has been on SSDI for 24 months or longer; or c) Claimant has End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) As such, regardless of settlement value and including “compromise” settlements, you must consider Medicare’s interests. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
Baxter, 423 F.3d at 372; In re Interest of Zarate, No. 96 C 50394, 1996 WL 734613, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
Baxter, 423 F.3d at 372; In re Interest of Zarate, No. 96 C 50394, 1996 WL 734613, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 5:16 am
" 453 F.3d 1099, 1102 (8th Cir. 2006). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
Proc. 11(c)(1)(C). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
FRCP 65(c). [read post]
