Search for: "Cain v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision blocking the enforcement of key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-7029, and Cain v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
To state the obvious, such legislation would be contrary not only to Roe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:20 pm by Viking
Fay Observer reports that: Jurors in the court-martial of a Fort Bragg soldier [United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
”  The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
Cain to give the petitioner a new trial. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-474, involving former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud conviction; and Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:48 am by Jim Dempsey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said in its 2009 United States v. [read post]