Search for: "California Company v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 9,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
We indicated that the likely impact is that companies may use the new law to attempt to cleanse an out of state employee from an otherwise valid non-compete agreement under another state’s law by having the employee move to California to work. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc. (7/28/14) --- Cal.4th --- (discussed here), the California Supreme Court held that an Unfair Competition Law (UCL) action based on a trucking company’s alleged violation of state labor and insurance laws was not “related to a price, route or service” of the company and, therefore, was not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA). [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:20 pm
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/HowToFileRetaliationComplaint.htm The post Andrews v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:43 pm
In the Opinion (Grisham v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
The California Supreme Court yesterday issued its opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 6:46 am
This is what happened in Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 11:15 pm
This is what happened in Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
In Innes v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:11 pm
In a partial victory for California workers, the State's highest court ruled, in Salas v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
For instance, a national company with a footprint in many states may use one form agreement calling for another state's choice of law, or even a forum selection clause. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm
On June 30, 2011, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 9:08 am
On June 10, 2019, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state wage and hour laws do not apply to certain drilling rig employees working off the California coast. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm
This uptick has not only heightened the legal and financial pressures on companies across various industries but also raised questions about the broader implications for the state’s business environment. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:35 am
Erhart v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In Sullivan, et. al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:15 pm
Reports of a recent California State Supreme Court ruling are buzzing throughout personal injury and media circles in California touting the reversal to a previous appeal that has ruled in favor of insurance companies. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
Last week, the California court decided McGill v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
The California federal court had no patience with Liberty stating, “ERISA cases are irrelevant to California insurance law. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 3:03 pm
Multi-state employers - take note. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 10:12 am
But then in a federal breach of contract case involving a state-legal cannabis company (Siva Enterprises v. [read post]
