Search for: "California Natural Products"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
Takeaway: The differences between which ingredients have been deemed “natural” versus “artificial” may seem minute—such as malic acid versus d-l malic acid—but advertisers should be wary not to open themselves to potential liability by mislabeling or ambiguously-labeling a product’s ingredients. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
Takeaway: The differences between which ingredients have been deemed “natural” versus “artificial” may seem minute—such as malic acid versus d-l malic acid—but advertisers should be wary not to open themselves to potential liability by mislabeling or ambiguously-labeling a product’s ingredients. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:58 pm
By Riëtte van Laack – On August 24, 2011, another class action suit regarding “natural” food labeling claims was filed in the Southern District of California. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
The law was originally intended to provide some comfort to individuals working on production lines and performing similar tasks. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:20 pm
The following products are subject to recall [view label]: 2-oz. packages containing Citterio “Premium Italian-Style Salame Sticks ALL NATURAL” with “best by” dates through Jan. 23, 2022, located next to the barcode. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:46 am
Determining a product’s nature or characterizing flavor requires review of the label, and the labels here were dissimilar. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 6:48 pm
Google LLC, 3-19-cv-01301 (SDCA 2020-10-20, Order) (Cathy Ann Bencivengo), the District Court for the Southern District of California recently considered whether litigation funding documents could be withheld from production by plaintiff Impact Engine because the documents were work product protected. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:49 pm
On June 29, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law California's Electronic Discovery Act, which is effective immediately. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:48 pm
California and Federal Laws on CBD in Food and Drink Products CBD was removed from the list of Schedule I narcotics by the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 1:18 pm
Last week the California Restaurant Association announced that the group and the City of Berkeley entered into a settlement agreement immediately halting enforcement of the City’s ‘first in the nation’ ban on natural gas piping as the City Council takes steps to repeal the 2019 ordinance after the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
Crucially, there is no threshold number for product sales in California. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:58 am
Crucially, there is no threshold for product sales in California. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:05 am
California has approved a new, alternative “Safe Harbor” warning label for foods containing acrylamide, a naturally-occurring byproduct that occurs during high-heat cooking. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:26 am
Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, 660 Fed.Appx. 531 (9th Cir. 2016)Brazil brought the usual California claims, alleging that defendants deceptively described their fruit products as “All Natural Fruit. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
As a result, manufacturers face mounting pressure to market their products as “clean” or “natural. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:07 am
According to the complaint, California Naturel advertises its Sunscreen SPF 30 product as “all natural” and says it “uses only the purest, most luxurious and effective ingredients found in nature. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:17 am
JMBM’s Natural Resources & Mining Practice Group Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP has one of California’s leading natural resources and mining practice groups. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:23 pm
”The purchasers alleged that this labeling deceived consumers because the drink products contained HFCS, which they asserted is not a natural product. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 3:43 pm
Investigators are working to determine if additional products may be contaminated. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
Because HFCS doesn't exist in nature, plaintiff alleged that "100% Natural" was false and misleading under California consumer protection law. [read post]
