Search for: "California v. Booth"
Results 121 - 136
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
June Carbone and I have written in Red Families v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Lecumberri displayed those items at the GMReis booth at the 2007 AAOS Meeting in San Diego, California. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:59 pm
Winner: California Law ReviewLaw review has fallen upon some hard times. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:08 pm
California (07-11073) and Zamudio v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
Examples of such states include California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Tennessee, among others. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:01 am
The issue was whether the ordinance's restriction on operating hours was valid under the California Constitution, and its requirement that the doors to peep show booths remain open was valid under the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
The issue was whether the ordinance's restriction on operating hours was valid under the California Constitution, and its requirement that the doors to peep show booths remain open was valid under the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
Booth. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
As Judge Jenkins noted, Baker v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
AI Index: AMR 51/087/2007 When a capital defendant seeks to circumvent procedures necessary to ensure the propriety of his conviction and sentence, he does not ask the State to permit him to take his own life. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:33 pm
In Startzell v. [read post]
