Search for: "California v. Brady"
Results 121 - 140
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Cain, 14-10008 (presenting questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel); and Taylor v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Cain, 14-10008, another fifth-time relist, asks a pair of questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:38 am
As Wikipedia explains, Brady v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Ash v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
” Brady v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
It asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, 15-233, and Acosta-Febo v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, 15-233, and Acosta-Febo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Cain 14-10008Issue: (1) Whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Yee, 15-169, involves the California Unclaimed Property Law. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
To facilitate compliance with Brady v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Engage in a Brady colloquy. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
The defense and the defendant have no idea whether Brady material exists. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Nor did either Brady or Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
President Jimmy Carter Four months after arguments in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
Mazzarella, Ninth Circuit: After being convicted of twelve felony counts related to a mortgage fraud scheme, Appellant moved for a new trial, arguing that the government had withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Mazzarella, Ninth Circuit: After being convicted of twelve felony counts related to a mortgage fraud scheme, Appellant moved for a new trial, arguing that the government had withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Connick 14-708Issue: (1) Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in refusing to find a triable issue as to whether there is a “policy” or “custom” when there was significant evidence of Brady v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
