Search for: "California v. Gomez" Results 121 - 140 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by WSLL
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:53 pm by James Eckert
The judge cannot replace a deliberating juror without the defendant's express written consent, executed in open court (CPL 270.35[1]; People v Gomez, 308 AD2d 460 [2d Dept 2003]). [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
A practice especially troubling, even beyond the history and importance of the Great Writ, given the requirement of Article VI of the California Constitution, which allows commissioners the power only to exercise "subordinate" judicial duties. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 10:05 am
The precedent cited, Gomez v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 12:37 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Cal. 2004), the court followed Torres, apparently without realizing the California Supreme Court had disapproved it. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Gomez-Gomez, No. 05-41461 Sentence for illegally reentering the United States is affirmed by the court sitting en banc, where a prior sex offense committed using constructive, i.e. nonphysical, force qualified as a "forcible sex offense" for sentence-enhancement purposes. [read post]