Search for: "California v. Perez"
Results 121 - 140
of 255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 11:57 am
Perez, No. 13-25765 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 11:57 am
Perez, No. 13-25765 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am
Monday’s oral argument in Perez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
Perez, No. 13-25765 (9th Cir. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
Perez, 22 U.S. 579 (1824) (A defendant may be retried where he has not be convicted or acquitted. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
Perez-Velazquez, 2007 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 5:26 pm
” Perez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
On Tuesday, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 8:22 am
Dec. 441 (BIA 2018), and the only other court of appeals to reach this issue, see Hernandez-Perez v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:50 am
(Perez v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
Arguing that the Court should strike down the California law at issue in the case, Jared Newman of PCWorld observes that even without the law, “[v]ideo games [already] have a system of self-regulation that’s among the best in the entertainment industry. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
Attorney's Office in 2012 prosecuted U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
But U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am
Perez and Texas v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
” At the Yale Law Journal’s online forum, Kathryn Kovacs discusses the Court’s decision in Perez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
Perez, 816 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2016) held that the DOL acted within the scope of their power, effectively invalidating Etheridge and Cumbie v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Harris that the Federal Meat Inspection Act preempts a California state law, and expresses concern that current regulations are inadequate . [read post]
