Search for: "California v. Sims" Results 121 - 140 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica)   United States US General Open source, digital… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica)   United States US General Open source, digital… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat)   Germany Regional Court Munich I partly rejects Bavarian state government’s attempt to use copyright laws to prevent reprints of Nazi newspaper by British publisher Peter McGee (IPKat) (The IP Factor)   India Delhi High Court restores PPL’s right to sue for copyright infringement on behalf of its members: PPL v Hotel Gold Regency & Ors (Spicy IP) Punitive damages as effective penalty (International Law Office) Religion and IP: The tales… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
Neuman, The Extraterritorial Constitution After Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
Middle Ages * 892: Sigurd the Mighty of Orkney strapped the head of a defeated foe to his leg, the tooth of which grazed against him as he rode his horse, causing the infection which killed him. * 1063: Béla I of Hungary died when his throne’s canopy collapsed. * 1135: Henry I of England is said to have died after gorging on lampreys, his favorite food. * 1219: According to legend, Inalchuk, the Muslim governor of the Central Asian town of Otrar, was captured and… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
Supreme Court of California, July 14, 2008 Silicon Valley Taxpayers Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
State, 73 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2000) ............................................................................ 15 California First Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
A phrase that, a little research reveals, has not yet graced the pages of the California Reporter. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:16 pm
On 5 October 2007 New York law firm, Folkenflik McGerity, filed a class action Complaint (http://fortunelegalpad.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/holman-v-apple.pdf) [PDF] in a court in California against Apple, Inc as well as AT T Mobility, LCC and others. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:45 pm
But you should read it even before I do.This is the "kangaroo court" case, which I previously discussed here and here, in which Judge Saiers seemed to call the California Court of Appeal a kangaroo court, and to which Justice Sims responded with a hearty bench slap.But now the opinion gets amended to -- largely -- take out the slams on Judge Saiers, in large part because the Court of Appeal accepts the word of the San Joaquin District Attorney, who writes a pretty… [read post]