Search for: "California v. Warner"
Results 121 - 140
of 397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Prince: Reviving the Forgotten Statutory Text https://t.co/nhBUL8i09z -> Warner Bros.' 'Superman' Rights Confirmed by Appeals Court https://t.co/xLCXw9kxH5 -> Remarks at the California Copyright Conference #irespectmusic Grassroots Advocacy Panel https://t.co/5tGGLpsDhO -> National | The EU-US Privacy Shield: Too timid? [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Prince: Reviving the Forgotten Statutory Text https://t.co/nhBUL8i09z -> Warner Bros.' 'Superman' Rights Confirmed by Appeals Court https://t.co/xLCXw9kxH5 -> Remarks at the California Copyright Conference #irespectmusic Grassroots Advocacy Panel https://t.co/5tGGLpsDhO -> National | The EU-US Privacy Shield: Too timid? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
As a result, the 2nd Circuit would now address the legal issue that copyrights in pre-1972 sound recordings didn't cover the right to exclusive public performance - a position successfully challenged by Turtle's musicians Flo & Eddie who filed filed 2013 lawsuits in California, Florida and New York. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:20 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
Friedrichs v California Teachers Association concerns freedom of association. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Trubridge, who had once been in a successful 70s pop band, said his band got just 3% of the 'recorded music' share of any stream - with his label (who were originally Magnet, now owned by Warners) taking the rest - 97%. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Warner Bros. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am
The case has since reached its newest milestone, which will be cause for celebration for many, and a loss for the few.For the uninitiated, the case of Rupa Marya v Warner/Chapell Music Inc dealt with the aforementioned song "Happy Birthday to You", which was created by the Hill sisters, Mildred and Patty, in the late 1800s (although only in melody). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
King in the Central District of California has just established that Warner-Chappell do not hold any valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics, Merpel recounts.* The "Happy Birthday" saga: when it may have been better not to have sued? [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
That all ended on September 22, 2015, when a California U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
That all ended on September 22, 2015, when a California U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:52 pm
AereoFox v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 122 Cal. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Geier v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:44 am
The only relevant case law found on this point was Marin v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:06 am
District Court for the Central District of California handed a big victory to Warner Bros. when it ruled that Gotham Garage violated Warner Bros. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 2:13 am
Una semana antes, en Warner v. [read post]
