Search for: "Call v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2016, 5:55 pm
Schumacher v City of Roswell, 2016 WL 3086089 (GA App 6/1/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Rezoning, Uncategorized [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:39 pm
So the only testimony is going to come from the deposition.So those eight minutes are pretty darn precious.Still, the Court of Appeal says that the statute says what it says, and that the Legislature made the call. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Citing Morillion v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:12 am
Superior Court, 2011 Cal. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:08 am
With two Superior Court judges endorsing this theory and several bankruptcy court judges rejecting it, all eyes are now on the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in the Eaton v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:43 pm
Seymore v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Third, the Court held that California law applied, despite a contract clause calling for Illinois choice of law and venue. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm
Superior Court (Romero), 13 Cal.4th 497, the California Supreme Court held that a Superior Court Judge could strike an allegation or vacate a finding under the Three Strikes law if they saw fit to do so in the interests of justice. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:28 am
In 2010, the Superior Court shocked the legal community by holding that correspondence between an attorney and an expert witness the attorney intends to call at trial is discoverable.Then, the Superior Court decided to take a second look. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 11:57 am
In another pro-policyholder ruling in Delaware, a Delaware Superior Court judge has denied a group of insurers’ application for certification of interlocutory appeal in the long-running D&O dispute, Verizon Communications Inc. et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:00 pm
Superior Court (1985) 39 Cal.3d 740, in which the California Supreme Court called the contingent fee agreement between a city government and a private attorney in a lawsuit against an adult bookstore "inappropriate under the circumstances. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
Coty brought a motion before the Quebec Superior Court seeking a so-called Norwich order that would require Costco to disclose the identity of its suppliers of Coty products. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
Coty brought a motion before the Quebec Superior Court seeking a so-called Norwich order that would require Costco to disclose the identity of its suppliers of Coty products. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:26 am
In September 2010, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania surprised attorneys across the state by holding that correspondence between an attorney and an expert witness who the attorney intends to call at trial is discoverable. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 2:42 pm
On June 3, 2020, I participated in Pennsylvania Superior Court history by attending the first ever virtual/online en banc argument session for this Court.The case was Fisher v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
In Jennifer Augustus v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for Benson. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
You can't really argue that much with today's opinion from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:10 pm
Let's call it BUI.So they charge him with a felony. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 10:53 am
A Staten Island Criminal Lawyer said that, in response to questions from the court, defendant said he understood both the waiver form and that there would not be an indictment, "consented to be prosecuted by a piece of paper called a superior court information," and wished to plead guilty to first-degree grand larceny, "the one and only count in the superior court information." [read post]
