Search for: "Canada v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
Foreign service providers interested in extending their brand equity to Canada will be encouraged by the Federal Court’s recent decision in AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
Foreign service providers interested in extending their brand equity to Canada will be encouraged by the Federal Court’s recent decision in AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
Foreign service providers interested in extending their brand equity to Canada will be encouraged by the Federal Court’s recent decision in AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
Foreign service providers interested in extending their brand equity to Canada will be encouraged by the Federal Court’s recent decision in AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm
In R. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:49 am
A recent Supreme Court of Canada decision R. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 1:58 pm
In their press release announcing their legal challenge, Krista Carr, Executive Vice-President of Inclusion Canada stated: People are dying. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
Trees and the Law in Canada Written by Dr. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
In the Federal Court’s decision of Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In June 2022, Parliament adopted a set of amendments, which, inter alia, allow Canada’s executive branch to seize or restrain property that is owned, held, or controlled by (a) a foreign State, (b) any person in that foreign State, or (3) a national of that foreign State who does not ordinarily result in Canada. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9) the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:16 am
Public Service Alliance of Canada v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 8:06 pm
Quebec (Attorney General) and R. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:09 am
With the recent attention on the term of copyright in Canada, Meera Nair reminds readers about recent Supreme Court of Canada comments on the importance of the public domain: In 2002, Justice Binne, writing for the majority in Théberge v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:23 pm
Library and Archives Canada informed us that most of the hardware and software from the previous, unused system—valued at approximately $975,000—was repurposed for other projects and servicesThe audit includes recommendations as well as Library and Archive Canada's response to many of the findings.For more coverage:Auditor General: Federal archives sitting on mountain of unsorted documents (Ottawa Citizen) Library and Archives Canada struggling… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:55 am
The highly anticipated Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) judgment in R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:14 pm
By: Hermione Shou The Supreme Court of Canada decided on the definition of an “employee” in the McCormick v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued a significant decision on the question of judicial authority over withdrawal by counsel in scheduled criminal proceedings: R. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
This result is different from that previously reached in the United States in the case of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
