Search for: "Caps v. Board Members"
Results 121 - 140
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
The IP Federation and its members have been tirelessly navigating the COVID-19 crisis - its impact on the lives and well-being of its members and society and its toll on the economy. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
(As I discuss in the paper, different members of the court have at times subscribed to three different justifications, though I think each of them is somewhat wanting.) [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Disney, Davy Crockett and the coonskin cap I UPC - update from UK on statutory instruments I The ILO rules reinstatement of Board of Appeal member, but EPO resists I INTA calling: The 2018 Ladas Memorial Award competition for paper on a trademark subject I R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heard I Germany: Bundespatentgericht annuls Nespresso capsule shape mark I Wind in the sails for atypical trade marks in the EU - graphical… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
Disney, Davy Crockett and the coonskin cap I UPC - update from UK on statutory instruments I The ILO rules reinstatement of Board of Appeal member, but EPO resists I INTA calling: The 2018 Ladas Memorial Award competition for paper on a trademark subject I R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heard I Germany: Bundespatentgericht annuls Nespresso capsule shape mark I Wind in the sails for atypical trade marks in the EU - graphical… [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm
" Daniel v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:33 am
Republican members of Lake County's election board had opposed the satellite centers, saying they would increase the chance of voting fraud. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Finally, Part IV combines the various state approaches and creates a solution that attempts to address the concerns of the homeowners associations and the members. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:23 am
It found no merit to the employer’s argument (premised on Justice White’s concurrence in Eastex v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
The deal undermines Turkey’s commitment as a NATO member to procure systems compatible with those of all other alliance members. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:43 am
The shrimpers claim Halliburton Energy Services Inc. was responsible for capping the well.The cases are Wetzel v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
Will the parents be responsible for room and board? [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm
The case, DRK Photo v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
Further, the court declined to assume that system board panel members were partial or biased simply because a certain party selected them. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 11:33 am
To the extent that the individual Reserve Banks run a surplus (after paying their assessments and capped dividends to their members), they are required to remit the extra funds to Treasury. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:10 pm
Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
