Search for: "Case v. Colvin" Results 121 - 140 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 8:37 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., April 23, 2015) (affirming denial of social security benefits) [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:21 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., June 2, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits: the administrative law judge's reasons for discounting the relevant medical opinions were neither insufficient nor illegitimate)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:47 am by Sme
Cases for the Week of September 1, 2014Hendron v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:40 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., July 15, 2015) (affirming dismissal of complaint challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits)Discrimination and RetaliationBandi v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 1:42 am by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., January 24, 2017) (affirming denial of disability benefits because the ALJ properly evaluated both credibility and evidence; there was no error) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:26 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., May 20, 2016) (affirming denial of disability based upon Jones's failure to show inconsistent or insufficient evidence against the determination)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 9:22 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., June 18, 2015) (reversing denial of disability benefits and supplemental security income because the ALJ committed Winfreyerror by failing to make proper findings)Contract/Noncompete/Trade Secret/Wrongful TerminationBrooks v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:21 am by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., January 4, 2017) (reversing district court's upholding commissioner denial of disability benefits, because the ALJ's analysis failed in several particulars)Wrongful TerminationVogt v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:09 am
Our Boston SSDI lawyers have handled numerous cases in which we have successfully requested waivers in these cases so that clients can avoid paying hefty lump sums or penalties. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
Securing a Social Security Disability Insurance judgment is not an simple or swift task in most cases. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:28 pm by Sme
Colvin, Acting Commissioner (10th Cir., November 21, 2014) (affirming denial of social security benefits despite severe impairments, as Alarid was not "disabled" within the meaning of the social security act) Torres v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:35 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., July 12, 2016) (affirming denial of disability and supplemental security benefits because the agency applied the correct legal standards and its findings were supported by substantial evidence) [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:53 pm by Rick
I actually meant to blog about the San Diego case of People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
In some cases, attorneys may be able to offer services to SSDI clients on a contingency-fee basis, meaning the attorney isn't paid unless you are. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:08 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., August 3, 2015) (affirming denial of disability insurance benefits)Workers CompensationMartinez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:29 pm by Sme
Colvin (10thCir., December 14, 2015) (affirming denial of social security benefits, based upon the ALJ’s credibility determination)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:29 am by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., May 1, 2015) (affirming denial of social security, disability benefits, and disabled widows benefits based on weight given to the treating physician's testimony)Public EmployeesHollenbach v. [read post]