Search for: "Cash v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 3:09 pm
Have a central location -- maybe as part of the superior court's web site -- where all these notices can be made. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
The court turned to State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 3:13 pm
Rodriguez et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
*The court also referred to the decisions in Matter of Karp v North Country Community College, 258 AD2d 775; Matter of Rubenstein v Simpson, 109 AD2d 885; and Dow v Board of Trustees of Farmingdale Public Library, 75 AD2d 632 in support of its ruling.There are a number of variations on the right to payment for unused vacation accruals. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:22 am
Similarly in May v Ballston Spa CSD, 170 AD2D 920, the Third Department ruled in favor of the employee upon its finding that the employee was induced to forego vacation when his superiors assured him that he would be paid for his unused leave notwithstanding his involuntary separation as a result of a layoff. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:53 am
., and Mellion v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:53 am
The matter was heard by Superior Court Judge Frederick DeVesa. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 6:34 am
While the trial court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the Superior Court granted it. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:30 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
Dexterity Points may be redeemed for cash. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:57 am
In Railroad Commission v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
The district court found that the cash was drug proceeds, denied Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
Kelly v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:38 pm
Id.; see Rosenthal v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
The 40-page complaint, filed in Superior Court of California in Los Angeles, claims that Seyfarth Shaw breached its fiduciary duty to Lancaster by forcing him to relinquish his equity share. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:40 pm
[1] IPC (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am
The court also held that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) were met. [read post]
