Search for: "Cass v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
The United States’ court system has a clear hierarchy, and lower courts are obliged to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 3:38 am
United StatesCox. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
In a development that has the potential to change the way private securities suits in the United States are litigated, the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Judges and scholars found confusing, for example, the Court’s 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:35 pm
United StatesPalin v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
handle=hein.journals/envtc1&collection=journals&id=7Sunstein, Cass R. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Acclaim for Obama’s actions rang loudly from The United Steelworkers. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
United States The Judge has reduced the damages in the Oberlin college libel case from $44m to $25m to comply with various limits laid down in Ohio law. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
The decision clarifies that a technical effect may be plausible without requiring the provision of tests or data; this is precisely the opposite of what was decided by Judge Arnold in the United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
" Bennett v.. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia expressed his view forcefully in a dissent in the 2001 case of United States v. [read post]
