Search for: "Castle v. Castle" Results 121 - 140 of 1,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2016, 7:05 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A man's home is his castle, and, with a few exceptions, the police cannot cross the threshold to make an arrest without a warrant. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Whose castle is it now? [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Whose castle is it now? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:40 am by scanner1
TOM LONGLEY, individually and CASTLE HOMES, LLC, Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:06 am
In Christopher Simmons v Derek Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, the Court of Appeal amended the guidance given in the earlier judgment of Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 by stating that, with effect from 1 April 2013, the proper level of general damages in all civil claims for six specified heads of loss will be 10% higher than previously, unless the claimant falls within section 44(6) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (the… [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:00 pm
First, King County today unveiled its new logo, changing from its longstanding “castle” and “crown” designs to the silhouette of the late Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm by Lyne Duhaime
The Quebec Superior Court recently considered employers’ rights in this regard in Synertech Moulded Products, Division of Old Castle Buildings v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am by INFORRM
In the case of Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 (a personal injury case) the Lord Chief Justice took the opportunity to announce that after 1 April 2013, general damages in tortious claims would increase by 10%. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 5:50 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland recently reviewed an appeal involving the arbitration of a medical malpractice claim in Castles of Love Assisted Living Homes, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]