Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 121 - 140
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 9:42 am
The Tax Court in Whistleblower 22716-13W v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:48 am
It’s not time to break out the champagne in Cincinnati, however, as the same day a unanimous court also reversed the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
Has someone been slagging off Champagne without specifying whose Champagne? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:08 am
Roger Fisher, Harvard Law Prof and Co-Author of ‘Getting To Yes’ http://ow.ly/dhE3t Analysis: Apple’s win dents Android’s standard-essential patent hopes http://ow.ly/dhEun How the Apple v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:52 am
But three justices had one more case to hear in Washington on Monday night: Claudio v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
The art works at issue often feature naked or scantily-dressed women holding Dom Pérignon champagne bottles and, in some instances, mere outlines of such bottles and their iconic label. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 2:47 pm
" Comment by Josephine Bloggs on Accidental law Student *** LAW BLOGGERS V EL PRESIDENTE I write from my Staterooms in West London… of villainy, outrage, and ambition…. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
Mumm & Cie v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 3:47 pm
El Presidente : ‘immodestly drank a champagne toast to his own ‘victory' from the silver winner's trophy of this year's internal mooting competition. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
____” or “U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 10:28 pm
See Cariou v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Grisworld v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:39 am
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
" Citing Royal Crown Co., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Kight v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:40 pm
The post Gaskin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Champagne? [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:15 am
Chatam International Incorporated and 750 ML, LLC1 v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
But everyone should keep the corks in the champagne. [read post]
