Search for: "Chappell v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Because returning a long-absent employee who suffered from severe stress to a less stressful shift could be a reasonable accommodation, a federal district court in Florida refused to dismiss a supervisor’s ADA and state law claims despite UPS’ argument that attendance was an essential function and she was not “qualified” due to her absence (Markwart v United Parcel Service, July 24, 2013, Chappell, S). [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
Tina ChappellTina Chappell (Associate General Counsel, Intel Corporation) was next up. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
Cameron (@JasmineDCameron) Trump – Intelligence Community Trump’s States Goals for the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
A call for sanity‘Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
16 May 2017, 1:14 pm by Guest Blogger
Lucas, 462 U.S. 367 (1983) and Chappell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am by MBettman
Copps Chappel held the only way a fee simple determinable could be created was to include language explicitly stating that the property would revert to the grantor upon the happening of a stated event. [read post]