Search for: "Cheeks v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
For Friday enjoyment, I post Pirri v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 9:19 am
Additional Resources: Rosewood Care Center of Swansea v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
In Henson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
The court held that Cheeks v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:16 pm
I can’t wait to bite your butt cheek. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:19 pm
(Photo credits: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States) Recent Stories on Constitution Daily Podcast: Loving v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 8:04 am
Granting the employee’s request for publication of its November 9, 2016 order, and recalling a December 2, 2016 mandate, the Ninth Circuit reversed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants and remanded for a trial on the merits of the employee’s federal and state sexual harassment claims and her state claim of failing to prevent sexual harassment (Zetwick v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
The controlling case for FLSA settlement agreements, and what must be in them, can be found at Dorian Cheeks v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
Indeed, he says, somewhat tongue-and-cheek, "my ideal proposal would be more progressive & benefit only unsuccessful artists. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
” (This may have been the first sign of Ruth’s future role as one of the most active and precise questioners on the United States Supreme Court Bench.) [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the career-offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague, and Jennings v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
