Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 11:43 am by John Elwood
McDonough, 21-972Issues: (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
In so doing, the Court went well beyond Chevron and simple gap-filling to claim broad discretionary power to reject delegations of authority to administrative agencies. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:28 am by John Elwood
McDonough, 21-972Issues: (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 4th, 8th, 9th and 10th Circuits hold; and (3) whether the portion of TWA v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
More noteworthy still, he also wrote that the fountainhead of modern administrative law — Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Interested in overruling Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:37 am by Steve Vladeck
” At the very least, the court concluded, the BIA’s interpretation to that effect was “reasonable,” and therefore entitled to deference under the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
See Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:05 pm
By setting filing and documentation requirements, the rules regulate the conduct of proceedings in the Office and the conduct of attorneys and other representatives, and by discouraging unnecessarily repetitive filings and providing examiners with needed information, they facilitate and expedite the processing of patent applications.In holding that the Final Rules are ultra vires, the court made no effort to measure the Final Rules against the actual terms of Section 2(b)(2), nor did the… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Finding that the statutory language was “subject to at least two different interpretations,” that court went on to apply the familiar rule of administrative law from the case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]