Search for: "Church v. Grant County" Results 121 - 140 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2010, 3:19 pm by David Smith
Suvini v Anderson, Staines County Court, 13 August 2010 It is well known that notices under section 21(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988 must give notice to a tenant that “after a date specified … being the last day of a period of the tenancy … possession of the dwelling-house is required”. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
The second new grant is in Ayestas v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  The Court’s relist streak continues as this week’s lone grant was again a Relist Watch alumnus: Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
decision by the Supreme Court of Texas in Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm by Heidi Meinzer
City County of the City of Falls Church – were highlighted in the post late last year, Case Watch: Upcoming Virginia Supreme Court Opinions. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dutch Church of City of N.Y. v 198 Broadway, 76 NY2d 411, 413; Duncan v Popoli, 105 AD3d 803, 804-805). [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
The Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has labored long and hard over the appeal taken by the Episcopal Church (USA) and its local diocese and parishes from the July 24, 2015 summary judgment order granted against them by Judge Chupp of the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
The Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has labored long and hard over the appeal taken by the Episcopal Church (USA) and its local diocese and parishes from the July 24, 2015 summary judgment order granted against them by Judge Chupp of the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
A Superior Court judge in Kern County recently granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the nonsensical grounds that it was required, under "neutral principles of law," to defer to the "ecclesiastical determinations" of the Episcopal Church (USA).The judgment would most likely be overturned by the same Court that reversed the earlier and similar summary judgment in the Fresno case, but that would mean another two to three years of litigation and thousands and… [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Howard Friedman
Maricopa County, (9th Cir., Nov. 1, 2010), the 9th Circuit upheld dismissal of a pre-trial detainee's complaint that a jalil's playing of holiday music violated the Establishment Clause.In Freeman v. [read post]