Search for: "Cincinnati v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2014, 10:20 am by Lyle Denniston
A federal judge in Cincinnati, broadening an earlier ruling in favor of same-sex marriage, ruled on Monday that the state of Ohio must give full marital rights to gay and lesbian couples who were or will be married in other states. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Co., 2009 WL 188051 (6th Cir. 1/27/09). [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 9:11 am
Court of Appeals in a case entitled ACLU v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Flawed at its inception, the doctrine languished, with no states adopting it until the Supreme Court’s decision in Garcetti v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The cases involve two gay couples from Cincinnati who were married in states that recognized gay marriage. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
Court of Appeals In Cincinnati has ruled.In 2007, Universal Health Card and Coverdell & Company created a program designed to provide health care discounts to consumers. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 11:02 am
For example, in a recent case, Cincinnati Women's Services v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
I guess the risk of asserting a claim did not offset the potential of success.The case is Holtz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:11 pm
Paschal (George Mason University Law School) has posted Congressional Power to Change Constitutional Law: Three Lacunae (University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 77, p. 1053, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:10 am by MBettman
Last year Caitlin Graham Felvus, a 2014 graduate of the University of Cincinnati College of Law, wrote an article for the University of Cincinnati Law Review on the Miller decision entitled “Advancement of Legal Fees May be More Than Corporations Bargained For: Miller v. [read post]