Search for: "City of Sacramento v. State of California"
Results 121 - 140
of 249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:19 am
See also Rowland v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 11:48 am
California Coastkeeper Alliance v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
” (Elonis v United States, 16). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm
Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
City of Sacramento (2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 698. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
This spring, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:55 am
Martin on behalf of the California State Association of Counties and 33 cities and counties. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903] and Ocean View [Estates Homeowners Assn, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of San Diego v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:52 am
" Judge Kroyer's decision "was not 'in conformity with the spirit of the law,' and could be said to 'defeat the ends of substantial justice.'" The Court cites to City of Sacramento v. [read post]
