Search for: "Clark v. Bridges et al" Results 121 - 139 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
RONALD DEVITO, ET AL.; (A-4951-06T1; Decided August 3, 2009): Picture by PhillipC Notwithstanding any limitations in the language of a Will, the probable intent of the testator must prevail. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from NEIL EDELMAN, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
Fedex Lending Corporationfiled 06/01/07   closed 10/23/071:07-cv-03121Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:37 am by PaulKostro
DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL., __ N.J. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:56 pm
This form of investing by sovereigns has become an important new element in emerging patterns of governance in this century (Clark et al., 2010; Gilson & Milhaupt 2007–8). [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
 In theory, at least, Haile should not involve any great difference or require reworking; but, as I will try to explain, its consequences may well reverberate just as much as Johnson et al. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Zetzsche et. al., The Distributed Liability of Distributed Ledgers: Legal Risks of Blockchain, 2018 U. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
The fashion industry's products are typically segmented into broad categories forming what has been described as a fashion pyramid, consisting of a designer category at the top with three different segmentations of products.[3] First is a very small trade in haute couture, or extremely expensive custom designed clothing entirely for women.[4] Directly below is a much larger business in designer ready-to-wear clothing for women and men.[5] This tier is further segmented into prestige collections… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
”[18]Further, it was argued that while the claim of authorship by species other than homo sapiens may be novel, “authorship” under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C § 101 et seq., is sufficiently broad so as to permit the protection of the law to extend to any original work, including those created by Naruto. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
”[18]Further, it was argued that while the claim of authorship by species other than homo sapiens may be novel, “authorship” under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C § 101 et seq., is sufficiently broad so as to permit the protection of the law to extend to any original work, including those created by Naruto. [read post]