Search for: "Clark v. Judge" Results 121 - 140 of 2,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2009, 7:00 am
Mar 26, 2009) (NO. 9:07-CV-104)Judge: Ron ClarkJudge Clark recently conducted a bench trial on the defendant's claims of laches and patent misuse in this case. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:05 am
The Legal Intelligencer (2/11, Elliot-Engel) reports, "A month before a pharmaceutical class action was set for trial, a Philadelphia judge decertified the class of users of an epilepsy and neuralgia drug seeking reimbursement from the drug's maker after being prescribed the drug for uses not approved by federal regulators" granting "a pharmaceutical company defendant's motion for class decertification in Clark v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:08 am
The most recent ILB entry in the case of Clark County Council and Clark County Auditor v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The recent decision of the Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)) resulted in the Claimant’s case being struck out on the basis that there had been no real or substantial tort following Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc ([2005] QB 946). [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:16 am
CIV.A. 2:06CV205) Judge: Ron ClarkHolding: Claims construction opinionInteresting claims construction opinion by Judge Clark. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 4:45 pm
Author Basher Eyre Licence CC BY-SA 2.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Melissa Clarke) PSN Recruitments Ltd  v Ludley and another [2023] EWHC 3153 (IPEC) (8 Dec 2023)This was a claim by PSN Recruitment Ltd (trading as Cosmopolitan Recruitment ("Cosmopolitan") against its former employee, Graeme Ludley ("Mr Ludley") [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:21 pm
Judge Tangeman (up in San Luis Obispo) did the right thing, and granted a new trial on damages when the jury pretty clearly awarded attorney Clark Fergus a $1.2 million contingency fee even though they were expressly instructed that Fergus was only entitled to a reasonable (hourly) fee.But while he was right on the merits (in my view), he was wrong on procedure, and issued his factual findings supporting the grant of a new trial 15 days after the verdict, rather than within 10… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal in England & Wales has handed down its judgment in the matter of Howard Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648, on appeal from the decision of Sir David Eady, sitting as a judge of the High Court on the Queen’s Bench Division Media and Communications List. [read post]