Search for: "Clark v. Phillips" Results 121 - 140 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” A trial court’s grant of a CPLR 4401 motion for judgment as a matter of law is appropriate where the trial court finds that, upon the evidence presented, there is no rational process by which the fact trier could base a finding in favor of the nonmoving party'” (Geeta Temple-Ashram v Satyanandji, 142 AD3d 1132, 1134, quoting Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553, 556; accord Clarke v Phillips, 112 AD3d 872, 874). [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
" by Irish scholar, sage and legal consultant Robert Clark;* A note on the new US trade mark dilution statute by John L. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
Reports that, in the case of Clift v Clarke, the applicant has failed in a bid to obtain an order forcing Mail Online to disclose the identities of two people who made comments about her on the newspaper website. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
A weekly (or thereabouts) collection of news about counterfeits, fakes, knockoffs, replicas, imitations, and the culture of copying in general around the globe: Knockoff Oscars: 2008 Plagiarius awards announcedNo touch of mink: TTAB rules that "Mink" is misdescriptive for synthetic shoesOne ring to rule them both: PA court rules c.z. engagement ring didn't invalidate prenupBrutta figura: Fakes, immigrant sweatshop labor cheapen "Made in Italy" labelItalianate… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:10 am by Adam Wagner
That runs as a constant theme through the authorities, but the following are particularly clear and helpful expressions: Goodson at [59] per Richards J, Takoushis at [94] and following per Sir Anthony Clarke MR, and L at [21]-[31] especially at [29] per Lord Phillips. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
In Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba  v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 Panellists are Mr Justice Arnold, Chris Wadlow, Phillip Johnson and Birgit Clark. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  The key components come from the ‘Advocaat’ case (Erven Warnink B.V. v J. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]