Search for: "Clayton Holdings, Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2021, 2:00 am
Clayton County, she was no longer required to show age was the sole reason she was terminated. [read post]
4 May 2021, 2:00 am
Clayton County, she was no longer required to show age was the sole reason she was terminated. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 10:10 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 12:52 pm
Oldcastle Northeast, Inc., 507 F.3d 117 (2d Cir. 2007). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:54 am
Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. opinion and had never been applied to invalidate an arbitration agreement. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 3:47 pm
Microsoft is a leading candidate to buy Yahoo, says analyst Clayton Moran. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
There was a fair amount of turnover at the February 15 conference, with one relist getting the nod (while its companion case had to settle for a hold) and one lucky petitioner winning summary reversal. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Gensler’s total number of final rules (51) is below that of Clayton (54) and Schapiro (62), if a little higher than White (44). [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
The complaining competitors sought relief under § 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Staples, Inc., 190 F. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The Culligan Decision But in June 2014, the First Department issued Culligan Soft Water Co. v Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLC (118 AD3d 422 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 2:32 pm
In New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:19 am
Feb. 1, 2012) ("AMEX III"), holding, for the third time, that a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement between American Express and plaintiff merchants was unenforceable because it would effectively preclude plaintiffs from vindicating their federal statutory rights under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:19 am
Feb. 1, 2012) ("AMEX III"), holding, for the third time, that a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement between American Express and plaintiff merchants was unenforceable because it would effectively preclude plaintiffs from vindicating their federal statutory rights under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Prior to the new rules, Regulation A has been used for a number of notable initial public offerings, such as Elio Motors, Inc., Myomo, Inc., Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc. and ShiftPixy, Inc., among others. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
Tea Co., Inc. v. [read post]
