Search for: "Close v. People"
Results 121 - 140
of 12,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
You're rarely able to look at what happens behind closed doors, in chambers, as the justices draft a published opinion. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:25 pm
Seems to me like she was just speaking loosely.Like normal people often do. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
” In People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:27 am
See, Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm
In the case of People v Scott, 63 NY2d 518 [1984], the criminal court held that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am
In any case, following the success of Baker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:03 pm
People v Newman, 2012 N.Y. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Which in turn means that if, as here, the prior 180-day period expired on a Saturday, a date the court was closed, then the 90-day period starts from the following Monday (assuming that Monday isn't a holiday, in which case on Tuesday).Second, Judge Ricciardulli's opinion sets forth every single one of the relevant statutes and principles that establish that this is the right result; e.g., Section 12 of the CCP, which extends dates that end on holidays; Sections 134 and 135… [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
I think that the misconduct during closing argument here was pretty egregious. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:21 pm
Eggemeyer v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 1:13 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:48 am
We could only get as close as the far side of the Washington monument. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
It's very close to where the I-5 and the I-710 meet; if you've driven on the I-5 in L.A., it's slightly to the northwest of the Citadel outlets - that big shopping mall that you see from the highway with the huge statutes that sort of looks like a fortress.But here's the thing:There's no casino there.The victim allegedly gets shot at "the casino's entrance. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
I don't see how the charging document proves anything close to the fact that "as a matter of law" Mr. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 6:41 pm
But maybe religious services are more like a night at the movies, because (as Breyer notes in dissent) “the risk of transmission is higher when people are in close contact with one another... [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Attorneys must be aware of the rules pertaining to closing argument and must make every effort to stay well within these rules." [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 6:01 pm
In Ramsey v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
Yeah, at some level, that's interesting, to some people at least. [read post]
