Search for: "Coalition for Responsible v. EPA" Results 121 - 140 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The company also failed to implement spill response plans, document spills and properly train employees for handling the material. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
For the alleged Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) violation for failure to immediately notify the National Response Center of the chlorine release, Norfolk Southern will pay a penalty of $32,500, to be deposited in the Hazardous Substance Superfund. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:08 am by David Doniger
Court of Appeals in Washington under the name Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm by Steven M. Taber
Chamber of Commerce, 13 House lawmakers and the Southeastern Legal Foundation, and the Coalition for Responsible Regulation (E&ENews PM, Feb. 16). [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at: U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPA published the Endangerment Finding in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Kevin Conrad, executive director of the Coalition for Rainforest Nations and a special envoy for Papua New Guinea, said in an interview that while Obama has improved the rhetoric, “when you look at what they’re proposing, it’s absolutely unimpressive. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:09 am by David Doniger
  The right response is to build in strong safeguards and watchdogs to make sure that no one can manipulate or corner markets. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
EPA News Release, October 29, 2009 Tempe, Ariz., developer Lennar Communities Development, Inc., has settled with the Environmental Protection Agency for a total of $182,519 – a combined $38,425 fine and $144,094 supplemental environmental project – in response to alleged dust violations that occurred at residential construction sites in Maricopa County. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:04 pm by David Doniger
EPA, that the current Clean Air Act gives EPA the responsibility to curb carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping pollutants. [read post]