Search for: "Collins v. Held" Results 121 - 140 of 1,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
Collins and David Skover; that was followed by commentary from Richard Hasen, Burt Neuborne, Ilya Shapiro, and Paul Smith. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
Last week a five-judge bench consisting of Lords Walker, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Collins heard an appeal in what is likely to become a landmark case in private international law and, specifically, cross-border insolvency. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
Lords Walker, Mance and Collins held that: “the application did not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm by Hunter Biederman
Davis further states, "While the undersigned believes that much of this newly discovered evidence will be held to be inadmissible at trial, he believes disclosure of this evidence should be made to ensure full compliance with Brady v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that in Collins v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
*Dr Matt Collins QC is a member of the Victorian Bar and a Senior Fellow of the Melbourne Law School. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
”  In 2002, the Court held in Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:37 am by Rosalind English
Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2010] UKSC 3 SC (Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Saville, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Collins) January 27 2010 Article 4(2) of the European Directive 2003/4 imposes a duty to disclose environmental information. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Before this new opinion, the Court of Appeal's most recent word on these issues had been Collins v. eMachines, Inc., 202 Cal.App.4th 249 (2011). [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Susan Collins of Maine – “offered an upbeat assessment of their meeting Tuesday, highlighting the judge’s statement that the Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:42 am
Abdullah v City of Westminster [2007] EWCA Civ 1566 is not a new case. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:36 am
The court held that Plaintiff sufficiently alleged that Palisades knew collection of debt the second time was improper because it could be inferred that Asset Acceptance – the entity first contracted to collect the debt – informed Palisades of its successful collection of the debt. [read post]