Search for: "Comfort v. Comfort" Results 121 - 140 of 5,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
  Lash quotes the "Minority Report" as follows: [Section Three] disfranchises all of that class of persons therein named, who "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof," but denounces no penalties against those who may hereafter commit the same act. . . . [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
WIPIP session 6: IP Theory
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Graham v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Some amici, such as Professor Kurt Lash, have filed briefs arguing that the presidency is not a “disqualified” office covered by the Positions Clause—in other words, that Section 3 permits someone to serve as President (or Vice-President) even if they are a covered person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States (indeed, even if they’ve “given aid or comfort” to foreign… [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Ilya Somin] My Supreme Court Amicus Brief in Trump v. Anderson—the Section 3 Disqualification Case
31 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm by Ilya Somin
(Tannen Maury/UPI/Newscom)Today, I filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
159 Trademark Registrations Issued to Indiana Entities in December 2023
31 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
MICHAEL’S HOT SAUCE 7235126 DAPPER JACKSON 7236817 GRABR 7256237 WAX BARISTA 7239266 GOOD VEGAN BAD VEGAN 7250890 GRIEF STINKS 7254451 THE BADGE SHACK 7255976 RIDGELINE 7250743 OPTAVISE NOW 7247488 AFTERSCHOOL HQ YOUR HOME FOR AFTERSCHOOL EXPERIENCES 7250981 7250982 7243879 LECATOU 7246613 OLD NATIONAL BANCORP 7243094 GUARDIANVIEW 360 7233702 I WANT TO GET OLD 7243404 THE DANGEROUS BUTTERFLY 7234171 LAMBDA CAR CLUB 7240132 POWER JACK 7256228 ENGAME 7252794 MALOMO 7250479 I WANNA SEX YOU UP… [read post]
Indiana Intellectual Property Lawyer Blog - http://www.iniplaw.org/
No, Omar Cannot be Denaturalized on the Basis of her “Somalians First” Speech
31 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
In Johannessen v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
SEC Commissioner Dissents from Denial of Petition to Change No-Admit, No-Deny Policy
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/
Should Death Penalty Abolitionists Try to Make the Death Penalty More Humane?
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
So one might think, but in the 2015 case of Glossip v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Supreme Court Weighs Another “Who’s Ya Daddy” Case with “Mixed” Results.
29 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm by Mark Ashton
Enter B.C. v. [read post]
Pennsylvania Family Law - http://pafamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
A Different Environmental Perspective: February 2024 Report Cates 1980
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part One: Why the U.S. Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election Ballot
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
 Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson: Introduction
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Top Experts’ Views of Int’l Court of Justice Ruling on Israel Gaza Operations (South Africa v Israel, Genocide Convention Case)
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
The last insurrection case considered by Congress
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Scott Bomboy
United States and Schenck v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog