Search for: "Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania" Results 121 - 140 of 1,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 5:53 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his Opinion handed down on January 28, 2011, in the case of Bulger v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
(Stabile, J., Concurring)The Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas did not commit any error in a products liability case when it instructed the jury on both the consumer expectation test and the risk-utility test that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court established in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
Pennsylvania's public natural resources are the common property of all the people, including generations yet to come. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:36 am by David Walk
Pennsylvania common-law courts have given a degree of deference to the FDA, completely apart from preemption for a long time. [read post]
31 May 2007, 6:11 am
Wyeth Lawsuit (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) On May 31, 2007 Wyeth announced that the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, of the Pennsylvania state court system, had granted the pharmaceutical company's motion for post-trial relief, and entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Wyeth in the lawsuit Jennie Nelson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
The Court also suggested that injuries sustained in an accident must be attributable to the common causes of a vehicle. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
Hopefully, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will see fit to override that decision and will not stand in the way of the county courts of common pleas in enacting local rules regarding the use of ACT. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am by Guest Author
The Mahons sought an injunction in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, asking the court to prohibit the Company from mining and causing subsidence and damage to their home, citing a recently adopted statute as the basis for their argument. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Zulick, of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas granted the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment based upon the hills and ridges doctrine in a case where the record contained evidence that the Plaintiff's fall occurred right after a recent snowfall which caused slippery conditions. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:51 am
”As noted in the post, a Pennsylvania case arrived at a different conclusion, Scott v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:21 pm
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in this fashion in Gallagher v. [read post]